Merge pull request 'docs: add live-operation issue tracking design and plan (#80)' (#395) from task/80-implementation-audit-closeout into base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302

Reviewed-on: #395

docs/commands.md

@@ -59,6 +59,18 @@ scripts/tea_comment.sh 374 /tmp/comment.md
 - `scripts/tea_comment.sh` accepts stdin with `-` as body source.
 - The helper fails fast when body looks like escaped-newline text only.
 
+#### PR Body Post-Check (Mandatory)
+
+PR 생성 직후 본문이 `\n` 문자열로 깨지지 않았는지 반드시 확인한다.
+
+```bash
+python3 scripts/validate_pr_body.py --pr <PR_NUMBER>
+```
+
+검증 실패 시:
+- PR 본문을 API patch 또는 파일 기반 본문으로 즉시 수정
+- 같은 명령으로 재검증 통과 후에만 리뷰/머지 진행
+
 #### ❌ TTY Error - Interactive Confirmation Fails
 ```bash
 ~/bin/tea issues create --repo X --title "Y" --description "Z"

docs/ouroboros/01_requirements_registry.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <!--
 Doc-ID: DOC-REQ-001
-Version: 1.0.7
+Version: 1.0.12
 Status: active
 Owner: strategy
 Updated: 2026-03-02
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 - `REQ-V2-005`: 라벨링은 Triple Barrier(Upper/Lower/Time) 방식이어야 한다.
 - `REQ-V2-006`: 검증은 Walk-forward + Purge/Embargo를 강제한다.
 - `REQ-V2-007`: 백테스트는 비용/슬리피지/체결실패를 반영하지 않으면 채택 불가다.
-- `REQ-V2-008`: Kill Switch는 신규주문차단 -> 미체결취소 -> 재조회 -> 리스크축소 -> 스냅샷 순서다.
+- `REQ-V2-008`: Kill Switch는 신규주문차단 -> 미체결취소 -> 재조회(실패 시 최대 3회, 1s/2s backoff 재시도, 성공 시 즉시 중단) -> 리스크축소 -> 스냅샷 순서다.
 
 ## v3 핵심 요구사항
 
@@ -38,3 +38,9 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 - `REQ-OPS-002`: 문서의 수치 정책은 원장에서만 변경한다.
 - `REQ-OPS-003`: 구현 태스크는 반드시 테스트 태스크를 동반한다.
 - `REQ-OPS-004`: 원본 계획 문서(`v2`, `v3`)는 `docs/ouroboros/source/` 경로를 단일 기준으로 사용한다.
+
+## 변경 이력
+
+- 2026-03-02: `v1.0.12` 문서 검증 게이트 강화(#390) 반영에 따라 정책 문서 동기화 체크를 수행했다. (`REQ-OPS-002`)
+
+- 2026-03-04: 86_peak_probability_model_plan.md 초안 추가에 따른 정책 문서 동기화 체크를 수행했다. (REQ-OPS-002)

docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 # v2/v3 구현 감사 및 수익률 분석 보고서
 
 작성일: 2026-02-28
-최종 업데이트: 2026-03-02 (#373 상태표 정합화 반영)
+최종 업데이트: 2026-03-02 (#377 kill-switch refresh 재시도 정책 반영)
 대상 기간: 2026-02-25 ~ 2026-02-28 (실거래)
 분석 브랜치: `feature/v3-session-policy-stream`
 
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 | REQ-V2-001 | 4-상태 매도 상태기계 (HOLDING→BE_LOCK→ARMED→EXITED) | `src/strategy/position_state_machine.py` | ✅ 완료 |
 | REQ-V2-002 | 즉시 최상위 상태 승격 (갭 대응) | `position_state_machine.py:51-70` | ✅ 완료 |
 | REQ-V2-003 | EXITED 우선 평가 | `position_state_machine.py:38-48` | ✅ 완료 |
-| REQ-V2-004 | 4중 청산 로직 (Hard/BE/ATR Trailing/Model) | `src/strategy/exit_rules.py` | ⚠️ 부분 (`#369`) |
+| REQ-V2-004 | 4중 청산 로직 (Hard/BE/ATR Trailing/Model assist-only, 직접 EXIT 미트리거) | `src/strategy/exit_rules.py` | ✅ 완료 |
 | REQ-V2-005 | Triple Barrier 라벨링 | `src/analysis/triple_barrier.py` | ✅ 완료 |
 | REQ-V2-006 | Walk-Forward + Purge/Embargo 검증 | `src/analysis/walk_forward_split.py` | ✅ 완료 |
 | REQ-V2-007 | 비용/슬리피지/체결실패 모델 필수 | `src/analysis/backtest_cost_guard.py`, `src/analysis/backtest_pipeline.py` | ✅ 완료 |
-| REQ-V2-008 | Kill Switch 실행 순서 (Block→Cancel→Refresh→Reduce→Snapshot) | `src/core/kill_switch.py` | ⚠️ 부분 (`#377`) |
+| REQ-V2-008 | Kill Switch 실행 순서 (Block→Cancel→Refresh(retry)→Reduce→Snapshot) | `src/core/kill_switch.py` | ✅ 완료 |
 
 ### 1.3 v3 구현 상태: 부분 완료 (2026-03-02 기준)
 
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 | REQ-V3-001 | 모든 신호/주문/로그에 session_id 포함 | ⚠️ 부분 | 큐 intent에 `session_id` 누락 (`#375`) |
 | REQ-V3-002 | 세션 전환 훅 + 리스크 파라미터 재로딩 | ✅ 완료 | 세션 경계 E2E 회귀(override 적용/해제 + 재로딩 실패 폴백) 보강 (`#376`) |
 | REQ-V3-003 | 블랙아웃 윈도우 정책 | ✅ 완료 | `src/core/blackout_manager.py` |
-| REQ-V3-004 | 블랙아웃 큐 + 복구 시 재검증 | ⚠️ 부분 | 큐 포화는 oldest-drop 정책으로 정합화 (`#371`), 재검증 강화는 `#328` 추적 |
+| REQ-V3-004 | 블랙아웃 큐 + 복구 시 재검증 | ✅ 완료 | DB 기록(`#324`), 재검증 강화(`#328`), 큐 포화 oldest-drop(`#371`) 반영 |
 | REQ-V3-005 | 저유동 세션 시장가 금지 | ✅ 완료 | `src/core/order_policy.py` |
 | REQ-V3-006 | 보수적 백테스트 체결 (불리 방향) | ✅ 완료 | `src/analysis/backtest_execution_model.py` |
 | REQ-V3-007 | FX 손익 분리 (전략 PnL vs 환율 PnL) | ⚠️ 부분 | 런타임 분리 계산/전달 적용 (`#370`), buy-side `fx_rate` 미관측 시 `fx_pnl=0` fallback |
@@ -89,13 +89,13 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 - **해소**: 세션 경계 E2E 회귀 테스트를 추가해 override 적용/해제, 재로딩 실패 시 폴백 유지를 검증함 (`#376`)
 - **요구사항**: REQ-V3-002
 
-### GAP-4: 블랙아웃 복구 DB 기록 + 재검증 → ⚠️ 부분 해소 (#324, #328, #371)
+### GAP-4: 블랙아웃 복구 DB 기록 + 재검증 → ✅ 해소 (#324, #328, #371)
 
 - **위치**: `src/core/blackout_manager.py`, `src/main.py`
 - **현 상태**:
-  - #324 추적 범위(DB 기록)는 구현 경로가 존재
+  - #324: 복구 주문 DB 기록 구현 및 테스트 반영
-  - #328 범위(가격/세션 재검증 강화)는 추적 이슈 오픈 상태
+  - #328: 가격/세션 재검증 강화 구현 및 머지 완료
-  - #371: 큐 포화 정책을 oldest-drop으로 명시/구현해 최신 intent 유실 경로를 제거
+  - #371: 큐 포화 정책을 oldest-drop으로 명시/구현해 최신 intent 유실 경로 제거
 - **요구사항**: REQ-V3-004
 
 ### GAP-5: 시간장벽이 봉 개수 고정 → ✅ 해소 (#329)
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 | 블랙아웃 복구 주문 `log_trade()` 추가 (GAP-4) | #324 | ✅ 머지 |
 | 세션 전환 리스크 파라미터 동적 재로딩 (GAP-3) | #327 | ✅ 머지 |
 | session_id 거래/의사결정 로그 명시 전달 (GAP-1, GAP-2) | #326 | ✅ 머지 |
-| 블랙아웃 복구 가격/세션 재검증 강화 (GAP-4 잔여) | #328 | ✅ 머지 |
+| 블랙아웃 복구 가격/세션 재검증 강화 (GAP-4) | #328 | ✅ 머지 |
 
 **잔여 개선 항목:**
 
@@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ Updated: 2026-03-02
 | P1 | US 시장 ATR 공급 경로 완성 (ROOT-5 잔여) | 중간 |
 | P1 | FX PnL 운영 활성화 (REQ-V3-007) | 낮음 |
 | P2 | pred_down_prob ML 모델 대체 (ROOT-5 잔여) | 높음 |
-| P2 | 세션 경계 E2E 통합 테스트 보강 (GAP-3 잔여) | 낮음 |
 
 ### 5.3 권장 실행 순서
 

docs/ouroboros/86_peak_probability_model_plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+<!--
+Doc-ID: DOC-PLAN-086
+Version: 0.1.0
+Status: draft
+Owner: strategy
+Updated: 2026-03-02
+-->
+
+# 고점 확률 모델 도입 계획 (초안)
+
+작성일: 2026-03-02  
+목적: 기존 계획(v2)의 "모델 보조 신호"를, 실운용 가능한 단순한 형태로 재정의한다.
+
+---
+
+## 1. 한 줄 요약
+
+- 목표는 "지금이 고점(또는 고점 근처)일 확률"을 예측해 익절/축소/오버나잇 리스크 결정을 보조하는 것이다.
+- 1차는 정규장 중심으로 시작하고, NXT/US_PRE 등 확장세션은 이후 분리 대응한다.
+
+---
+
+## 2. 왜 바꾸는가
+
+- 기존 논의는 범위가 넓어 구현/검증 비용이 컸다.
+- 현재 로그 구조에서도 빠르게 시작 가능한 타깃이 필요하다.
+- 실거래 효용 기준에서 "고점 근처 감지"는 청산 품질 개선에 직접 연결된다.
+
+---
+
+## 3. 이번 계획의 핵심 결정
+
+### 3.1 예측 타깃 (2개)
+
+- `p_top_d0`: 현재 시점이 "오늘 정규장 고점(근접 포함)"일 확률
+- `p_top_d1`: 현재 시점이 "내일 정규장 마감까지 포함한 고점(근접 포함)"일 확률
+
+### 3.2 모델 역할
+
+- 단독 매도 트리거가 아니라 보조 신호로 사용한다.
+- Hard stop / ATR trailing / Kill Switch 우선 원칙은 유지한다.
+
+### 3.3 적용 순서
+
+1. KR/US 정규장만 대상으로 MVP 구축
+2. 성능/운영 안정화 후 NXT, US_PRE, US_AFTER 분리 확장
+
+---
+
+## 4. 데이터/라벨 정의 (MVP)
+
+### 4.1 샘플 단위
+
+- 단위: "시점 t의 관측값 1개"
+- 대상: 주문 가능 시점 중 정책 게이트를 통과하는 시점
+
+### 4.2 라벨 정의
+
+- `y_d0 = 1` if `max_high(t ~ 오늘 정규장 마감) <= price_t * (1 + eps_d0)` else `0`
+- `y_d1 = 1` if `max_high(t ~ 내일 정규장 마감) <= price_t * (1 + eps_d1)` else `0`
+
+### 4.3 필수 피처 (초기)
+
+- 가격/수익률: `current_price`, `price_change_pct`
+- 미시지표: `rsi`, `volume_ratio`, `signal`, `score`
+- 포트폴리오: `portfolio_pnl_pct`, `total_cash`(선택)
+- 상태: `market`, `session_id`, `minutes_to_close`, `is_tradeable_now`
+
+### 4.4 데이터 제외 규칙 (초기)
+
+- `session_id in ('', 'UNKNOWN')` 제외
+- `price <= 0` 또는 `quantity <= 0` 제외
+- `rationale LIKE '[startup-sync]%'` 제외
+- 라벨 윈도우 불완전(휴장/데이터 누락) 샘플 제외
+
+---
+
+## 5. 추론/실행 규칙 (초안)
+
+### 5.1 추론 출력
+
+```json
+{
+  "p_top_d0": 0.00,
+  "p_top_d1": 0.00,
+  "model_version": "TBD"
+}
+```
+
+### 5.2 실행 반영 원칙
+
+- `p_top_d0`가 높으면: 당일 익절/트레일링 강화
+- `p_top_d1`가 높으면: 오버나잇 보유 축소/청산 우선
+- 확장세션(NXT/US_PRE)은 초기엔 보수 임계치 또는 실행 제한
+
+---
+
+## 6. 세션 이슈 대응 원칙
+
+### 6.1 거래 가능 세션 기준
+
+- 달력 시간이 아니라 "종목이 실제 거래 가능한 세션" 기준으로 라벨/추론을 구성한다.
+
+### 6.2 정규장 vs 확장세션 분리
+
+- MVP: 정규장 전용 라벨/모델
+- 확장: 세션별 헤드 또는 세션별 모델 분리 검토
+
+### 6.3 고점 정의 분리
+
+- `reg_high`: 정규장 고점 (주 라벨)
+- `ext_high`: 확장세션 포함 고점 (보조 분석)
+
+---
+
+## 7. 단계별 구현 계획
+
+### Phase A: 계약 고정
+
+- 학습용 canonical dataset 스키마 확정
+- 시점 정렬(as-of) 규칙 문서화
+- 라벨 생성 함수/검증 테스트 추가
+
+### Phase B: 오프라인 검증
+
+- Walk-forward + Purge/Embargo 평가
+- `d0`, `d1` 분리 리포트
+- B1(모델 없음) 대비 개선 여부 확인
+
+### Phase C: 런타임 통합
+
+- 추론 결과를 `pred_top_d0/pred_top_d1`로 주입
+- 매도/축소 보조 규칙 연결
+- Shadow 모드로 관측 후 제한적 활성화
+
+### Phase D: 세션 확장
+
+- NXT/US_PRE/US_AFTER 정책 분리
+- 실행 게이트/임계치 세션별 튜닝
+
+---
+
+## 8. 지금 당장 결정할 최소 항목 (TBD)
+
+- [ ] `eps_d0`, `eps_d1` 기본값 (`TBD`)
+- [ ] `p_top_d0`, `p_top_d1` 실행 임계치 (`TBD`)
+- [ ] 정규장/확장세션 대상 시장 범위 (`TBD`)
+- [ ] 최소 학습 샘플 수 기준 (`TBD`)
+- [ ] Shadow 관측 기간 (`TBD`)
+
+---
+
+## 9. 리스크 및 완화
+
+- 라벨 불균형: class weight, threshold 튜닝
+- 시간대 편향(장마감 근처): 시간 피처 추가 + 구간별 성능 보고
+- 데이터 무결성: 제외 규칙 강제 + CI 검증
+- 복잡도 증가: 정규장 MVP를 먼저 잠그고 확장세션은 후속 분리
+
+---
+
+## 10. 후속 문서 연결 (예정)
+
+- requirements registry: 신규 REQ/TASK/TEST 매핑 추가
+- code-level work orders: 구현 작업 분해
+- acceptance/test plan: `p_top_d0/d1` 검증 항목 추가
+- implementation audit: 기존 "모델 보조 신호" 항목 업데이트
+

docs/plans/2026-03-02-dual-track-workflow-execution-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+# Dual-Track Workflow Execution Plan (Revised)
+
+> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
+
+**Goal:** Re-seed workflow planning from a clean base branch (not the temporary branch), then execute isolated `86` and `80` tracks with real-operation-confirmed closeout and related Gitea issue closure.
+
+**Architecture:** Start from `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` and create `base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302`. Bring only two workflow plan docs as one squashed seed commit. Branch `task/86...` and `task/80...` from that base with strict file-scope separation. For `80`, update audit only after real-operation confirmation, then close related Gitea issues (children before parent). Final promotion happens by merging the validated stream to `main`.
+
+**Tech Stack:** Git CLI, Gitea (`tea`) issue/PR workflow, Markdown docs (`docs/ouroboros`, `docs/plans`)
+
+---
+
+### Task 1: Freeze temporary branch and identify export scope
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: none
+- Create: none
+- Test: none
+
+**Step 1: Inspect temporary branch state**
+
+Run: `git status --short --branch`
+Expected: current temporary branch with local changes listed.
+
+**Step 2: Preserve changes using stash (recommended)**
+
+Run: `git stash push -u -m "tmp-before-workflow-reseed-2026-03-02"`
+Expected: stash created with tracked/untracked changes.
+
+**Step 3: Define transferable artifacts**
+
+Run: keep only these for reseed:  
+- `docs/plans/2026-03-02-ouroboros-dual-track-workflow-design.md`  
+- `docs/plans/2026-03-02-dual-track-workflow-execution-plan.md`
+Expected: transfer scope fixed to two files.
+
+**Step 4: Verify clean working tree**
+
+Run: `git status --short --branch`
+Expected: no local changes.
+
+**Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no commit in this task (stash-only preservation)
+```
+
+### Task 2: Create clean official base and seed one commit
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/plans/2026-03-02-ouroboros-dual-track-workflow-design.md`
+- Modify: `docs/plans/2026-03-02-dual-track-workflow-execution-plan.md`
+- Test: none
+
+**Step 1: Switch to canonical base**
+
+Run: `git checkout feature/v3-session-policy-stream`
+Expected: branch switch successful.
+
+**Step 2: Update local base**
+
+Run: `git pull --ff-only origin feature/v3-session-policy-stream`
+Expected: up-to-date or fast-forward update.
+
+**Step 3: Create staging base branch**
+
+Run: `git checkout -b base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302`
+Expected: new branch created from updated feature base.
+
+**Step 4: Restore only two plan docs from temporary branch commits**
+
+Run (example): `git checkout <temp-branch> -- docs/plans/2026-03-02-ouroboros-dual-track-workflow-design.md docs/plans/2026-03-02-dual-track-workflow-execution-plan.md`
+Expected: only two files restored in working tree.
+
+**Step 5: Create one squashed seed commit**
+
+Run: `git add docs/plans/2026-03-02-ouroboros-dual-track-workflow-design.md docs/plans/2026-03-02-dual-track-workflow-execution-plan.md && git commit -m "docs: seed revised dual-track workflow plan"`
+Expected: single commit with two files only.
+
+**Step 6: Verify seed scope**
+
+Run: `git show --name-only --oneline HEAD`
+Expected: exactly the two plan docs listed.
+
+**Step 7: Push official base**
+
+Run: `git push -u origin base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302`
+Expected: remote tracking set.
+
+### Task 3: Open Track A (`86`) branch and initial PR
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/ouroboros/86_peak_probability_model_plan.md`
+- Test: none
+
+**Step 1: Create Track A branch**
+
+Run: `git checkout -b task/86-peak-probability-plan`
+Expected: branch created from official base.
+
+**Step 2: Stage only `86` document**
+
+Run: `git add docs/ouroboros/86_peak_probability_model_plan.md`
+Expected: only `86` doc staged.
+
+**Step 3: Commit initial PR seed**
+
+Run: `git commit -m "docs: seed peak probability model plan (#86)"`
+Expected: one-document commit.
+
+**Step 4: Push branch**
+
+Run: `git push -u origin task/86-peak-probability-plan`
+Expected: remote branch created.
+
+**Step 5: Open PR-A**
+
+Run: `tea pr create --base base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302 --head task/86-peak-probability-plan --title "docs: seed peak probability model plan (#86)" --description "Initial planning PR for iterative concretization."`
+Expected: PR URL returned.
+
+### Task 4: Open Track B (`80`) branch for operation-confirmed closeout
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md`
+- Test: operation observation evidence (outside unit-test scope)
+
+**Step 1: Return to staging base**
+
+Run: `git checkout base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302`
+Expected: branch switch successful.
+
+**Step 2: Create Track B branch**
+
+Run: `git checkout -b task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`
+Expected: branch created.
+
+**Step 3: Apply closeout edits only after real-operation confirmation**
+
+Run: edit `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md`
+Expected: status/evidence sections updated with observed behavior, confirmation timestamp, and operational proof summary.
+
+**Step 4: Commit closeout update**
+
+Run: `git add docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md && git commit -m "docs: close out implementation audit items after operation confirmation (#80)"`
+Expected: single-scope commit.
+
+**Step 5: Push and open PR-B**
+
+Run: `git push -u origin task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`
+Expected: remote branch created.
+
+Run: `tea pr create --base base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302 --head task/80-implementation-audit-closeout --title "docs: close out implementation audit items (#80)" --description "Closeout based on real-operation confirmation."`
+Expected: PR URL returned.
+
+### Task 5: Close related Gitea issues after `80` confirmation
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md` (reference linkage only)
+- Test: issue parent-child completeness check
+
+**Step 1: Build related issue set from updated `80` audit**
+
+Run: parse issue references from `80` updated sections.
+Expected: target open issue list prepared.
+
+**Step 2: Close child issues first**
+
+Run: `tea issues close <child-issue-number>` for each confirmed child.
+Expected: all qualifying child issues closed.
+
+**Step 3: Close parent issues only when all children are closed**
+
+Run: `tea issues close <parent-issue-number>`
+Expected: parent closes only after dependency check passes.
+
+**Step 4: Record closure summary in PR comment**
+
+Run: add PR comment with closed issue IDs and parent-child resolution note.
+Expected: auditable trace for closeout.
+
+### Task 6: Validate branch hygiene and merge path
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: none
+- Test: git diff/log checks
+
+**Step 1: Verify PR-A scope**
+
+Run: `git diff --name-only base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302...task/86-peak-probability-plan`
+Expected: only `docs/ouroboros/86_peak_probability_model_plan.md` (and intentional related plan files if any).
+
+**Step 2: Verify PR-B scope**
+
+Run: `git diff --name-only base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302...task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`
+Expected: only `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md` (and intentional related plan files if any).
+
+**Step 3: Merge both PRs into staging base**
+
+Run: GitHub merge flow for PR-A and PR-B
+Expected: staging base includes both tracks without cross-file contamination.
+
+**Step 4: Promote validated stream to `main`**
+
+Run: open PR from `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` (or its validated promotion branch) to `main`
+Expected: merge-based history preservation with no cherry-pick/rebase surgery.
+
+**Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no additional commit required in this task
+```

docs/plans/2026-03-02-live-operation-issue-tracking-design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# Live Operation Issue Tracking Design
+
+**Date:** 2026-03-02  
+**Scope:** Real-operation confirmation tracking for all open Gitea issues, tied to `task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Goal
+
+Define an issue-by-issue tracking method for real-operation confirmation so that:
+
+- every open issue is tracked with explicit lifecycle states,
+- parent-child close order is enforced,
+- and final closeout is reflected in `80` audit work without loss.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Target Set
+
+- Coverage target: all current open Gitea issues (`318~381`, and future open issues during this closeout window).
+- Tracking starts from open set snapshot and stays synced until closeout completion.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Tracking Architecture
+
+- Primary log: direct comments on each issue ticket.
+- Aggregate log: single summary comment on the `80` PR (`task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`).
+- No separate tracking doc as source of truth during execution.
+
+---
+
+## 4. State Model and Criteria
+
+State machine:
+
+- `NOT_STARTED`
+- `OBSERVING`
+- `CONFIRMED`
+- `CLOSED`
+
+Rules:
+
+- `CONFIRMED` requires one real-operation observation evidence item.
+- `CLOSED` requires close conditions satisfied and ticket close action executed.
+- Parent issue cannot become `CLOSED` until all child issues are `CLOSED`.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Issue Comment Template
+
+Each issue update comment uses:
+
+- `Status: <STATE>`
+- `Observed At: <KST>, <UTC>`
+- `Environment: live`
+- `Evidence: <log/query/order-execution identifier>`
+- `Next: <single next action>`
+
+This template is reused for every transition for consistent auditability.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Parent-Child Policy
+
+- Parent issue comment must list child issue IDs.
+- Child issues transition independently.
+- Parent close gate:
+  - if any child is not `CLOSED`, parent remains at most `CONFIRMED`;
+  - when all children are `CLOSED`, parent can transition to `CLOSED` and be closed.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Operational Loop
+
+1. Initialize all open issues with `NOT_STARTED` comment.
+2. Move active issues to `OBSERVING` when live confirmation begins.
+3. Move to `CONFIRMED` after one real-operation evidence capture.
+4. Close child issues first, then close parent issue(s).
+5. Update the single `80` PR summary comment whenever issue state changes.
+6. Reflect final confirmed/closed outcomes in `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md`.
+
+---
+
+## 8. Evidence and Time Rules
+
+- Evidence must be replayable/referenceable by identifier (not vague narrative only).
+- Every update includes both KST and UTC timestamps.
+- Use absolute dates (example: `2026-03-02`) to avoid ambiguity in session handoff.
+
+---
+
+## 9. Completion Conditions
+
+Tracking design is complete when:
+
+- all open issues are represented in issue comments with valid lifecycle state,
+- parent-child closure constraints are respected,
+- `80` PR summary comment reflects current global status,
+- and final `80` audit document update is ready for closeout commit.

docs/plans/2026-03-02-live-operation-issue-tracking-implementation-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+# Live Operation Issue Tracking Implementation Plan
+
+> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
+
+**Goal:** Track real-operation confirmation for all open Gitea issues with per-issue comments and a synchronized summary on the `80` PR, then close issues in dependency-safe order.
+
+**Architecture:** Use issue tickets as the primary state log with a strict four-state lifecycle. Maintain one aggregate status comment on `task/80-implementation-audit-closeout` PR. Enforce child-first closure and parent close gating.
+
+**Tech Stack:** Git CLI, Gitea CLI (`tea`), Markdown (`docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md`)
+
+---
+
+### Task 1: Snapshot open issues and classify parent-child graph
+
+**Files:**
+- Create: none
+- Modify: none
+- Test: `tea issues ls` output inspection
+
+**Step 1: Capture open issue list**
+
+Run: `tea issues ls --state open --limit 200`
+Expected: list of all open issues (including `318~381`).
+
+**Step 2: Fetch details for each issue**
+
+Run: `for n in $(tea issues ls --state open --limit 200 --output json | jq -r '.[].number'); do tea issue view "$n"; done`
+Expected: issue bodies/comments available for relation parsing.
+
+**Step 3: Extract parent-child references**
+
+Run: parse issue text for relation keywords (`parent`, `child`, `depends on`, `blocks`).
+Expected: dependency map ready.
+
+**Step 4: Validate unresolved dependency edges**
+
+Run: verify each parent references only existing issue numbers.
+Expected: no dangling child references.
+
+**Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no commit (discovery task)
+```
+
+### Task 2: Initialize per-issue tracking comments (`NOT_STARTED`)
+
+**Files:**
+- Create: none
+- Modify: none
+- Test: issue comment presence check
+
+**Step 1: Prepare standard template text**
+
+```text
+Status: NOT_STARTED
+Observed At: <KST>, <UTC>
+Environment: live
+Evidence: N/A
+Next: Begin live observation for this issue.
+```
+
+**Step 2: Post initialization comment to each open issue**
+
+Run: `tea issues comment <issue-number> --message "<template>"`
+Expected: each open issue has one initialization comment.
+
+**Step 3: Verify comment coverage**
+
+Run: sample-check each issue (`tea issue view <issue-number>`) for latest status comment.
+Expected: 100% coverage across open issues.
+
+**Step 4: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no commit (ticket operations)
+```
+
+### Task 3: Create and maintain `80` PR aggregate status comment
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md` (final sync only, not this task)
+- Test: PR comment contains full issue table
+
+**Step 1: Identify PR number for `task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`**
+
+Run: `tea pr ls --state open`
+Expected: PR number for `task/80...` identified.
+
+**Step 2: Post initial summary comment**
+
+Run: `tea pr comment <pr-number> --message "<issue-state-summary-table>"`
+Expected: one aggregate comment listing `issue | state | last observed at | parent/child`.
+
+**Step 3: Define update protocol**
+
+Run: update same summary comment on every issue state change.
+Expected: summary remains single-source aggregate view.
+
+**Step 4: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no commit (ticket/PR operations)
+```
+
+### Task 4: Execute live observation loop and mark `OBSERVING` -> `CONFIRMED`
+
+**Files:**
+- Create: none
+- Modify: none
+- Test: evidence-backed state transitions present in issue comments
+
+**Step 1: Mark active issue as `OBSERVING`**
+
+Run: `tea issues comment <issue-number> --message "Status: OBSERVING ..."`
+Expected: issue history shows observation started.
+
+**Step 2: Capture one real-operation evidence item**
+
+Run: collect log/query/order identifier tied to issue behavior.
+Expected: one concrete evidence reference captured.
+
+**Step 3: Mark issue `CONFIRMED`**
+
+Run: `tea issues comment <issue-number> --message "Status: CONFIRMED ... Evidence: <id> ..."`
+Expected: issue has explicit confirmed state.
+
+**Step 4: Sync PR aggregate summary**
+
+Run: update `80` PR summary comment row for that issue.
+Expected: PR summary and issue status aligned.
+
+**Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no commit (ticket operations)
+```
+
+### Task 5: Close issues with child-first dependency enforcement
+
+**Files:**
+- Create: none
+- Modify: none
+- Test: parent close attempted only after all children closed
+
+**Step 1: Close confirmed child issues first**
+
+Run: `tea issues close <child-issue-number>`
+Expected: child issue state becomes closed.
+
+**Step 2: Verify all children for each parent**
+
+Run: evaluate dependency map for remaining non-closed children.
+Expected: parent close gate decision available.
+
+**Step 3: Close eligible parent issues**
+
+Run: `tea issues close <parent-issue-number>`
+Expected: parent is closed only when all children are closed.
+
+**Step 4: Post closure comment and sync PR summary**
+
+Run: comment `Status: CLOSED` on closed issue and update PR summary row.
+Expected: closure trace exists in both issue and PR aggregate.
+
+**Step 5: Commit**
+
+```bash
+# no commit (ticket operations)
+```
+
+### Task 6: Reflect final tracked outcomes in `80` audit and commit
+
+**Files:**
+- Modify: `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md`
+- Test: markdown consistency + traceability check
+
+**Step 1: Update `80` with final live-confirmed statuses**
+
+Run: edit status lines and evidence summary sections.
+Expected: document reflects final issue states and confirmation notes.
+
+**Step 2: Add issue closure summary block**
+
+Run: include closed child/parent sequence summary.
+Expected: audit reader can verify closure logic quickly.
+
+**Step 3: Validate references**
+
+Run: ensure issue numbers in doc match actual closed/open states.
+Expected: no mismatch between doc and Gitea.
+
+**Step 4: Commit closeout doc update**
+
+```bash
+git add docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md
+git commit -m "docs: finalize 80 audit with live-operation issue confirmations"
+```
+
+**Step 5: Push branch**
+
+Run: `git push`
+Expected: closeout commit available on `task/80-implementation-audit-closeout`.

docs/plans/2026-03-02-ouroboros-dual-track-workflow-design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# Ouroboros Dual-Track Workflow Design (Revised)
+
+**Date:** 2026-03-02  
+**Scope:** `docs/ouroboros/86_peak_probability_model_plan.md` and `docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md`
+
+---
+
+## 1. Goal
+
+Prevent work loss and history contamination while running two parallel tracks, while correcting an invalid starting condition (design commits created on a disposable temporary branch):
+
+- Track A: open and iterate the `86` plan as a dedicated PR.
+- Track B: finalize `80` only after real-operation behavior is confirmed, then reflect completion and close related Gitea open issues.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Constraints and Current Context
+
+- Current temporary branch is disposable and must not remain the authoritative base.
+- Canonical base line for current work is `feature/v3-session-policy-stream`.
+- Final integration strategy is to merge the full `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` line into `main` after operation-level validation is complete.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Approaches Considered
+
+1. Keep using temporary branch and continue from existing design commits.
+2. Create a clean base from `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` and move only plan artifacts as one commit (recommended).
+3. Split into two fresh bases (`86` and `80` separately) immediately.
+
+Recommendation rationale:
+
+- Approach 2 removes temporary-branch contamination risk.
+- It preserves clean lineage with a single "official starting point" commit.
+- It keeps downstream split for `86` and `80` straightforward.
+
+---
+
+## 4. Approved Branch and PR Topology
+
+- Long-lived source baseline: `feature/v3-session-policy-stream`
+- New official base: `base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302` (from `feature/v3-session-policy-stream`)
+- Official base contains only two workflow plan docs squashed into one commit.
+- Track A branch: `task/86-peak-probability-plan` (from official base)
+- Track B branch: `task/80-implementation-audit-closeout` (from official base)
+
+PR direction:
+
+- PR-A (`86`): `task/86-peak-probability-plan -> base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302`
+- PR-B (`80`): `task/80-implementation-audit-closeout -> base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302`
+- Final integration: `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` line merged into `main`
+
+---
+
+## 5. Completion Criteria per Track
+
+### Track A (`86`)
+
+- Open initial PR early with the planning document.
+- Continue iterative concretization in follow-up commits on the same branch.
+
+### Track B (`80`)
+
+- Do not close based on test-command artifacts alone.
+- Close only when modified behavior is confirmed in real operation.
+- Update `80_implementation_audit.md` with:
+  - observed behavior changes,
+  - confirmation timing,
+  - operation-side evidence summary.
+- After `80` real-operation confirmation and doc update, close related Gitea open issues immediately (same phase).
+- Parent issues close only when all child issues are confirmed closed.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Loss-Prevention Rules
+
+- Preserve temporary-branch unmerged changes first (stash or archival commit).
+- Exclude `workflow/session-handover.md` and `docs/ouroboros/86_peak_probability_model_plan.md` from official base-seeding commit.
+- Enforce file-scope separation:
+  - PR-A should avoid `80` edits.
+  - PR-B should avoid `86` edits.
+- Keep commit messages scoped to one track per commit.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Merge Strategy Decision
+
+- For this workflow, prefer merge-based lineage preservation.
+- Because the final promotion unit is the full `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` stream, avoid unnecessary cherry-pick/rebase-surgery unless a contamination incident occurs.
+
+---
+
+## 8. Immediate Next Actions
+
+1. Seed `base/ouroboros-workflow-20260302` from `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` with one squashed workflow-doc commit.
+2. Verify seed commit file scope contains only two plan docs.
+3. Create and open PR-A for `86`.
+4. Complete real-operation confirmation for `80`, update audit doc, then close related Gitea issues (children first, then parent).
+5. Merge validated `feature/v3-session-policy-stream` line into `main`.

docs/workflow.md

@@ -128,6 +128,16 @@ tea pr create \
   --description "$PR_BODY"
 ```
 
+PR 생성 직후 본문 무결성 검증(필수):
+
+```bash
+python3 scripts/validate_pr_body.py --pr <PR_NUMBER>
+```
+
+강제 규칙:
+- 검증 실패(`\n` 리터럴, 코드펜스 불균형, 헤더/리스트 누락) 상태에서는 리뷰/머지 금지
+- 본문 수정 후 같은 명령으로 재검증 통과 필요
+
 금지 패턴:
 
 - `-d "line1\nline2"` (웹 UI에 `\n` 문자 그대로 노출될 수 있음)

scripts/validate_docs_sync.py

@@ -92,6 +92,25 @@ def validate_testing_doc_has_dynamic_count_guidance(errors: list[str]) -> None:
         )
 
 
+def validate_pr_body_postcheck_guidance(errors: list[str]) -> None:
+    required_tokens = {
+        "commands": (
+            "PR Body Post-Check (Mandatory)",
+            "python3 scripts/validate_pr_body.py --pr <PR_NUMBER>",
+        ),
+        "workflow": (
+            "PR 생성 직후 본문 무결성 검증(필수)",
+            "python3 scripts/validate_pr_body.py --pr <PR_NUMBER>",
+        ),
+    }
+    for key, tokens in required_tokens.items():
+        path = REQUIRED_FILES[key]
+        text = _read(path)
+        for token in tokens:
+            if token not in text:
+                errors.append(f"{path}: missing PR body post-check guidance token -> {token}")
+
+
 def main() -> int:
     errors: list[str] = []
 
@@ -117,6 +136,7 @@ def main() -> int:
     validate_summary_docs_reference_core_docs(errors)
     validate_commands_endpoint_duplicates(errors)
     validate_testing_doc_has_dynamic_count_guidance(errors)
+    validate_pr_body_postcheck_guidance(errors)
 
     if errors:
         print("[FAIL] docs sync validation failed")
@@ -128,6 +148,7 @@ def main() -> int:
     print("[OK] summary docs link to core docs and links resolve")
     print("[OK] commands endpoint rows have no duplicates")
     print("[OK] testing doc includes dynamic count guidance")
+    print("[OK] PR body post-check guidance exists in commands/workflow docs")
     return 0
 
 

scripts/validate_ouroboros_docs.py

@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ ALLOWED_PLAN_TARGETS = {
     "2": (DOC_DIR / "source" / "ouroboros_plan_v2.txt").resolve(),
     "3": (DOC_DIR / "source" / "ouroboros_plan_v3.txt").resolve(),
 }
+ISSUE_REF_PATTERN = re.compile(r"#(?P<issue>\d+)")
+ISSUE_DONE_PATTERN = re.compile(r"(?:✅|머지|해소|완료)")
+ISSUE_PENDING_PATTERN = re.compile(r"(?:잔여|오픈 상태|추적 이슈)")
 
 
 def iter_docs() -> list[Path]:
@@ -119,6 +122,38 @@ def collect_req_traceability(
                 req_to_test.setdefault(req_id, set()).add(item_id)
 
 
+def validate_issue_status_consistency(path: Path, text: str, errors: list[str]) -> None:
+    issue_done_lines: dict[str, list[int]] = {}
+    issue_pending_lines: dict[str, list[int]] = {}
+
+    for line_no, raw_line in enumerate(text.splitlines(), start=1):
+        line = raw_line.strip()
+        if not line:
+            continue
+        issue_ids = [m.group("issue") for m in ISSUE_REF_PATTERN.finditer(line)]
+        if not issue_ids:
+            continue
+
+        is_pending = bool(ISSUE_PENDING_PATTERN.search(line))
+        is_done = bool(ISSUE_DONE_PATTERN.search(line)) and not is_pending
+        if not is_pending and not is_done:
+            continue
+
+        for issue_id in issue_ids:
+            if is_done:
+                issue_done_lines.setdefault(issue_id, []).append(line_no)
+            if is_pending:
+                issue_pending_lines.setdefault(issue_id, []).append(line_no)
+
+    conflicted_issues = sorted(set(issue_done_lines) & set(issue_pending_lines))
+    for issue_id in conflicted_issues:
+        errors.append(
+            f"{path}: conflicting status for issue #{issue_id} "
+            f"(done at lines {issue_done_lines[issue_id]}, "
+            f"pending at lines {issue_pending_lines[issue_id]})"
+        )
+
+
 def main() -> int:
     if not DOC_DIR.exists():
         print(f"ERROR: missing directory {DOC_DIR}")
@@ -140,6 +175,8 @@ def main() -> int:
         text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
         validate_metadata(path, text, errors, doc_ids)
         validate_links(path, text, errors)
+        if path.name == "80_implementation_audit.md":
+            validate_issue_status_consistency(path, text, errors)
         collect_ids(path, text, defs, refs)
         collect_req_traceability(text, req_to_task, req_to_test)
 

scripts/validate_pr_body.py

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Validate PR body formatting to prevent escaped-newline artifacts."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import json
+import re
+import subprocess
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
+HEADER_PATTERN = re.compile(r"^##\s+\S+", re.MULTILINE)
+LIST_ITEM_PATTERN = re.compile(r"^\s*(?:-|\*|\d+\.)\s+\S+", re.MULTILINE)
+
+
+def validate_pr_body_text(text: str) -> list[str]:
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    if "\\n" in text and "\n" not in text:
+        errors.append("body contains escaped newline sequence (\\n)")
+    if text.count("```") % 2 != 0:
+        errors.append("body has unbalanced fenced code blocks (``` count is odd)")
+    if not HEADER_PATTERN.search(text):
+        errors.append("body is missing markdown section headers (e.g. '## Summary')")
+    if not LIST_ITEM_PATTERN.search(text):
+        errors.append("body is missing markdown list items")
+    return errors
+
+
+def fetch_pr_body(pr_number: int) -> str:
+    try:
+        completed = subprocess.run(
+            [
+                "tea",
+                "api",
+                "-R",
+                "origin",
+                f"repos/{{owner}}/{{repo}}/pulls/{pr_number}",
+            ],
+            check=True,
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+        )
+    except (subprocess.CalledProcessError, FileNotFoundError) as exc:
+        raise RuntimeError(f"failed to fetch PR #{pr_number}: {exc}") from exc
+
+    try:
+        payload = json.loads(completed.stdout)
+    except json.JSONDecodeError as exc:
+        raise RuntimeError(f"failed to parse PR payload for #{pr_number}: {exc}") from exc
+
+    body = payload.get("body", "")
+    if not isinstance(body, str):
+        raise RuntimeError(f"unexpected PR body type for #{pr_number}: {type(body).__name__}")
+    return body
+
+
+def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace:
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
+        description="Validate PR body markdown formatting and escaped-newline artifacts."
+    )
+    group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=True)
+    group.add_argument("--pr", type=int, help="PR number to fetch via `tea api`")
+    group.add_argument("--body-file", type=Path, help="Path to markdown body file")
+    return parser.parse_args()
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    args = parse_args()
+    if args.body_file is not None:
+        if not args.body_file.exists():
+            print(f"[FAIL] body file not found: {args.body_file}")
+            return 1
+        body = args.body_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        source = f"file:{args.body_file}"
+    else:
+        body = fetch_pr_body(args.pr)
+        source = f"pr:{args.pr}"
+
+    errors = validate_pr_body_text(body)
+    if errors:
+        print("[FAIL] PR body validation failed")
+        print(f"- source: {source}")
+        for err in errors:
+            print(f"- {err}")
+        return 1
+
+    print("[OK] PR body validation passed")
+    print(f"- source: {source}")
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())

src/analysis/backtest_pipeline.py

@@ -94,14 +94,6 @@ def run_v2_backtest_pipeline(
         else sorted({bar.session_id for bar in bars})
     )
     validate_backtest_cost_model(model=cost_model, required_sessions=resolved_sessions)
-    execution_model = BacktestExecutionModel(
-        ExecutionAssumptions(
-            slippage_bps_by_session=cost_model.slippage_bps_by_session or {},
-            failure_rate_by_session=cost_model.failure_rate_by_session or {},
-            partial_fill_rate_by_session=cost_model.partial_fill_rate_by_session or {},
-            seed=0,
-        )
-    )
 
     highs = [float(bar.high) for bar in bars]
     lows = [float(bar.low) for bar in bars]
@@ -156,7 +148,7 @@ def run_v2_backtest_pipeline(
         execution_model = _build_execution_model(cost_model=cost_model, fold_seed=fold_idx)
         execution_return_model = _build_execution_model(
             cost_model=cost_model,
-            fold_seed=fold_idx,
+            fold_seed=fold_idx + 1000,
         )
         b0_pred = _baseline_b0_pred(train_labels)
         m1_pred = _m1_pred(train_labels)

src/core/kill_switch.py

@@ -3,13 +3,14 @@
 Order is fixed:
 1) block new orders
 2) cancel pending orders
-3) refresh order state
+3) refresh order state (retry up to 3 attempts with exponential backoff)
 4) reduce risk
 5) snapshot and notify
 """
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import asyncio
 import inspect
 from collections.abc import Awaitable, Callable
 from dataclasses import dataclass, field
@@ -34,16 +35,55 @@ class KillSwitchOrchestrator:
         report: KillSwitchReport,
         name: str,
         fn: StepCallable | None,
-    ) -> None:
+    ) -> bool:
         report.steps.append(name)
         if fn is None:
-            return
+            return True
         try:
             result = fn()
             if inspect.isawaitable(result):
                 await result
+            if result is False:
+                raise RuntimeError("step returned False")
+            return True
         except Exception as exc:  # pragma: no cover - intentionally resilient
             report.errors.append(f"{name}: {exc}")
+            return False
+
+    async def _run_refresh_with_retry(
+        self,
+        report: KillSwitchReport,
+        fn: StepCallable | None,
+        *,
+        max_attempts: int,
+        base_delay_sec: float,
+    ) -> None:
+        report.steps.append("refresh_order_state")
+        if fn is None:
+            return
+
+        attempts = max(1, max_attempts)
+        delay = max(0.0, base_delay_sec)
+        last_exc: Exception | None = None
+        for attempt in range(1, attempts + 1):
+            try:
+                result = fn()
+                if inspect.isawaitable(result):
+                    await result
+                if result is False:
+                    raise RuntimeError("step returned False")
+                return
+            except Exception as exc:
+                last_exc = exc
+                if attempt >= attempts:
+                    break
+                if delay > 0:
+                    await asyncio.sleep(delay * (2 ** (attempt - 1)))
+        if last_exc is not None:
+            report.errors.append(
+                "refresh_order_state: failed after "
+                f"{attempts} attempts ({last_exc})"
+            )
 
     async def trigger(
         self,
@@ -54,6 +94,8 @@ class KillSwitchOrchestrator:
         reduce_risk: StepCallable | None = None,
         snapshot_state: StepCallable | None = None,
         notify: StepCallable | None = None,
+        refresh_retry_attempts: int = 3,
+        refresh_retry_base_delay_sec: float = 1.0,
     ) -> KillSwitchReport:
         report = KillSwitchReport(reason=reason)
 
@@ -61,7 +103,12 @@ class KillSwitchOrchestrator:
         report.steps.append("block_new_orders")
 
         await self._run_step(report, "cancel_pending_orders", cancel_pending_orders)
-        await self._run_step(report, "refresh_order_state", refresh_order_state)
+        await self._run_refresh_with_retry(
+            report,
+            refresh_order_state,
+            max_attempts=refresh_retry_attempts,
+            base_delay_sec=refresh_retry_base_delay_sec,
+        )
         await self._run_step(report, "reduce_risk", reduce_risk)
         await self._run_step(report, "snapshot_state", snapshot_state)
         await self._run_step(report, "notify", notify)

src/main.py

@@ -1375,7 +1375,10 @@ async def _cancel_pending_orders_for_kill_switch(
                 )
 
     if failures:
-        raise RuntimeError("; ".join(failures[:3]))
+        summary = "; ".join(failures[:3])
+        if len(failures) > 3:
+            summary = f"{summary} (+{len(failures) - 3} more)"
+        raise RuntimeError(summary)
 
 
 async def _refresh_order_state_for_kill_switch(
@@ -1384,6 +1387,7 @@ async def _refresh_order_state_for_kill_switch(
     overseas_broker: OverseasBroker,
     markets: list[MarketInfo],
 ) -> None:
+    failures: list[str] = []
     seen_overseas: set[str] = set()
     for market in markets:
         try:
@@ -1399,6 +1403,12 @@ async def _refresh_order_state_for_kill_switch(
                 market.exchange_code,
                 exc,
             )
+            failures.append(f"{market.code}/{market.exchange_code}: {exc}")
+    if failures:
+        summary = "; ".join(failures[:3])
+        if len(failures) > 3:
+            summary = f"{summary} (+{len(failures) - 3} more)"
+        raise RuntimeError(summary)
 
 
 def _reduce_risk_for_kill_switch() -> None:

src/strategy/exit_rules.py

@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ def evaluate_exit(
         reason = "atr_trailing_stop"
     elif be_lock_threat:
         reason = "be_lock_threat"
-    elif model_exit_signal:
+    elif model_exit_signal and next_state == PositionState.BE_LOCK:
-        reason = "model_liquidity_exit"
+        reason = "model_assist_be_lock"
     elif take_profit_hit:
         # Backward-compatible immediate profit-taking path.
         reason = "arm_take_profit"

src/strategy/position_state_machine.py

@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ def evaluate_exit_first(inp: StateTransitionInput) -> bool:
 
     EXITED must be evaluated before any promotion.
     """
-    return inp.hard_stop_hit or inp.trailing_stop_hit or inp.model_exit_signal or inp.be_lock_threat
+    # model_exit_signal is assist-only and must not trigger EXIT directly.
+    return inp.hard_stop_hit or inp.trailing_stop_hit or inp.be_lock_threat
 
 
 def promote_state(current: PositionState, inp: StateTransitionInput) -> PositionState:
@@ -61,5 +62,8 @@ def promote_state(current: PositionState, inp: StateTransitionInput) -> Position
         target = PositionState.ARMED
     elif inp.unrealized_pnl_pct >= inp.be_arm_pct:
         target = PositionState.BE_LOCK
+    elif inp.model_exit_signal:
+        # Model signal assists risk posture by tightening to BE_LOCK.
+        target = PositionState.BE_LOCK
 
     return target if _STATE_RANK[target] > _STATE_RANK[current] else current

tests/test_kill_switch.py

@@ -53,3 +53,52 @@ async def test_kill_switch_collects_step_errors() -> None:
 
     report = await ks.trigger(reason="test", cancel_pending_orders=_boom)
     assert any(err.startswith("cancel_pending_orders:") for err in report.errors)
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_kill_switch_refresh_retries_then_succeeds() -> None:
+    ks = KillSwitchOrchestrator()
+    refresh_calls = {"count": 0}
+
+    def _flaky_refresh() -> None:
+        refresh_calls["count"] += 1
+        if refresh_calls["count"] < 3:
+            raise RuntimeError("temporary refresh failure")
+
+    report = await ks.trigger(
+        reason="test",
+        refresh_order_state=_flaky_refresh,
+        refresh_retry_attempts=3,
+        refresh_retry_base_delay_sec=0.0,
+    )
+    assert refresh_calls["count"] == 3
+    assert report.errors == []
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_kill_switch_refresh_retry_exhausted_records_error_and_continues() -> None:
+    ks = KillSwitchOrchestrator()
+    calls: list[str] = []
+
+    def _refresh_fail() -> None:
+        raise RuntimeError("persistent refresh failure")
+
+    def _reduce() -> None:
+        calls.append("reduce")
+
+    def _snapshot() -> None:
+        calls.append("snapshot")
+
+    report = await ks.trigger(
+        reason="test",
+        refresh_order_state=_refresh_fail,
+        reduce_risk=_reduce,
+        snapshot_state=_snapshot,
+        refresh_retry_attempts=2,
+        refresh_retry_base_delay_sec=0.0,
+    )
+    assert any(
+        err.startswith("refresh_order_state: failed after 2 attempts")
+        for err in report.errors
+    )
+    assert calls == ["reduce", "snapshot"]

tests/test_main.py

@@ -7154,3 +7154,27 @@ async def test_trigger_emergency_kill_switch_records_cancel_failure() -> None:
         )
 
     assert any(err.startswith("cancel_pending_orders:") for err in report.errors)
+
+
+@pytest.mark.asyncio
+async def test_refresh_order_state_failure_summary_includes_more_count() -> None:
+    broker = MagicMock()
+    broker.get_balance = AsyncMock(side_effect=RuntimeError("domestic down"))
+    overseas_broker = MagicMock()
+    overseas_broker.get_overseas_balance = AsyncMock(side_effect=RuntimeError("overseas down"))
+
+    markets = []
+    for code, exchange in [("KR", "KRX"), ("US_PRE", "NASD"), ("US_DAY", "NYSE"), ("JP", "TKSE")]:
+        market = MagicMock()
+        market.code = code
+        market.exchange_code = exchange
+        market.is_domestic = code == "KR"
+        markets.append(market)
+
+    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError, match=r"\(\+1 more\)$") as exc_info:
+        await main_module._refresh_order_state_for_kill_switch(
+            broker=broker,
+            overseas_broker=overseas_broker,
+            markets=markets,
+        )
+    assert "KR/KRX" in str(exc_info.value)

tests/test_strategy_exit_rules.py

@@ -22,17 +22,18 @@ def test_take_profit_exit_for_backward_compatibility() -> None:
     assert out.reason == "arm_take_profit"
 
 
-def test_model_assist_exit_signal() -> None:
+def test_model_assist_signal_promotes_be_lock_without_direct_exit() -> None:
     out = evaluate_exit(
-        current_state=PositionState.ARMED,
+        current_state=PositionState.HOLDING,
-        config=ExitRuleConfig(model_prob_threshold=0.62, arm_pct=10.0),
+        config=ExitRuleConfig(model_prob_threshold=0.62, be_arm_pct=1.2, arm_pct=10.0),
         inp=ExitRuleInput(
-            current_price=101.0,
+            current_price=100.5,
             entry_price=100.0,
             peak_price=105.0,
             pred_down_prob=0.8,
             liquidity_weak=True,
         ),
     )
-    assert out.should_exit is True
+    assert out.should_exit is False
-    assert out.reason == "model_liquidity_exit"
+    assert out.state == PositionState.BE_LOCK
+    assert out.reason == "model_assist_be_lock"

tests/test_strategy_state_machine.py

@@ -28,3 +28,29 @@ def test_exited_has_priority_over_promotion() -> None:
         ),
     )
     assert state == PositionState.EXITED
+
+
+def test_model_signal_promotes_be_lock_as_assist() -> None:
+    state = promote_state(
+        PositionState.HOLDING,
+        StateTransitionInput(
+            unrealized_pnl_pct=0.5,
+            be_arm_pct=1.2,
+            arm_pct=2.8,
+            model_exit_signal=True,
+        ),
+    )
+    assert state == PositionState.BE_LOCK
+
+
+def test_model_signal_does_not_force_exit_directly() -> None:
+    state = promote_state(
+        PositionState.ARMED,
+        StateTransitionInput(
+            unrealized_pnl_pct=1.0,
+            be_arm_pct=1.2,
+            arm_pct=2.8,
+            model_exit_signal=True,
+        ),
+    )
+    assert state == PositionState.ARMED

tests/test_validate_docs_sync.py

@@ -121,3 +121,44 @@ def test_validate_testing_doc_has_dynamic_count_guidance(monkeypatch) -> None:
     monkeypatch.setattr(module, "_read", fake_read)
     module.validate_testing_doc_has_dynamic_count_guidance(errors)
     assert errors == []
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_postcheck_guidance_passes(monkeypatch) -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    fake_docs = {
+        str(module.REQUIRED_FILES["commands"]): (
+            "PR Body Post-Check (Mandatory)\n"
+            "python3 scripts/validate_pr_body.py --pr <PR_NUMBER>\n"
+        ),
+        str(module.REQUIRED_FILES["workflow"]): (
+            "PR 생성 직후 본문 무결성 검증(필수)\n"
+            "python3 scripts/validate_pr_body.py --pr <PR_NUMBER>\n"
+        ),
+    }
+
+    def fake_read(path: Path) -> str:
+        return fake_docs[str(path)]
+
+    monkeypatch.setattr(module, "_read", fake_read)
+    module.validate_pr_body_postcheck_guidance(errors)
+    assert errors == []
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_postcheck_guidance_reports_missing_tokens(
+    monkeypatch,
+) -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    fake_docs = {
+        str(module.REQUIRED_FILES["commands"]): "PR Body Post-Check (Mandatory)\n",
+        str(module.REQUIRED_FILES["workflow"]): "PR Body Post-Check\n",
+    }
+
+    def fake_read(path: Path) -> str:
+        return fake_docs[str(path)]
+
+    monkeypatch.setattr(module, "_read", fake_read)
+    module.validate_pr_body_postcheck_guidance(errors)
+    assert any("commands.md" in err for err in errors)
+    assert any("workflow.md" in err for err in errors)

tests/test_validate_ouroboros_docs.py

@@ -79,3 +79,42 @@ def test_validate_links_avoids_duplicate_error_for_invalid_plan_link(tmp_path) -
 
     assert len(errors) == 1
     assert "invalid plan link path" in errors[0]
+
+
+def test_validate_issue_status_consistency_reports_conflicts() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    path = Path("docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md").resolve()
+    text = "\n".join(
+        [
+            "| REQ-V3-004 | 상태 | 부분 | `#328` 잔여 |",
+            "| 항목 | 상태 | ✅ 완료 | `#328` 머지 |",
+        ]
+    )
+
+    module.validate_issue_status_consistency(path, text, errors)
+
+    assert len(errors) == 1
+    assert "conflicting status for issue #328" in errors[0]
+
+
+def test_validate_issue_status_consistency_allows_done_only() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    path = Path("docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md").resolve()
+    text = "| 항목 | 상태 | ✅ 완료 | `#371` 머지 |"
+
+    module.validate_issue_status_consistency(path, text, errors)
+
+    assert errors == []
+
+
+def test_validate_issue_status_consistency_allows_pending_only() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    path = Path("docs/ouroboros/80_implementation_audit.md").resolve()
+    text = "| 항목 | 상태 | 부분 | `#390` 추적 이슈 |"
+
+    module.validate_issue_status_consistency(path, text, errors)
+
+    assert errors == []

tests/test_validate_pr_body.py

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import importlib.util
+import json
+from pathlib import Path
+from types import SimpleNamespace
+
+import pytest
+
+
+def _load_module():
+    script_path = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "scripts" / "validate_pr_body.py"
+    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("validate_pr_body", script_path)
+    assert spec is not None
+    assert spec.loader is not None
+    module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
+    spec.loader.exec_module(module)
+    return module
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_text_detects_escaped_newline() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors = module.validate_pr_body_text("## Summary\\n- item")
+    assert any("escaped newline" in err for err in errors)
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_text_allows_literal_sequence_when_multiline() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    text = "## Summary\n- escaped sequence example: \\\\n"
+    assert module.validate_pr_body_text(text) == []
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_text_detects_unbalanced_code_fence() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors = module.validate_pr_body_text("## Summary\n- item\n```bash\necho hi\n")
+    assert any("unbalanced fenced code blocks" in err for err in errors)
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_text_detects_missing_structure() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    errors = module.validate_pr_body_text("plain text only")
+    assert any("missing markdown section headers" in err for err in errors)
+    assert any("missing markdown list items" in err for err in errors)
+
+
+def test_validate_pr_body_text_passes_with_valid_markdown() -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+    text = "\n".join(
+        [
+            "## Summary",
+            "- item",
+            "",
+            "## Validation",
+            "```bash",
+            "pytest -q",
+            "```",
+        ]
+    )
+    assert module.validate_pr_body_text(text) == []
+
+
+def test_fetch_pr_body_reads_body_from_tea_api(monkeypatch) -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+
+    def fake_run(cmd, check, capture_output, text):  # noqa: ANN001
+        assert "tea" in cmd[0]
+        assert check is True
+        assert capture_output is True
+        assert text is True
+        return SimpleNamespace(stdout=json.dumps({"body": "## Summary\n- item"}))
+
+    monkeypatch.setattr(module.subprocess, "run", fake_run)
+    assert module.fetch_pr_body(391) == "## Summary\n- item"
+
+
+def test_fetch_pr_body_rejects_non_string_body(monkeypatch) -> None:
+    module = _load_module()
+
+    def fake_run(cmd, check, capture_output, text):  # noqa: ANN001
+        return SimpleNamespace(stdout=json.dumps({"body": 123}))
+
+    monkeypatch.setattr(module.subprocess, "run", fake_run)
+    with pytest.raises(RuntimeError):
+        module.fetch_pr_body(391)

workflow/session-handover.md

@@ -105,3 +105,35 @@
 - next_ticket: #368
 - process_gate_checked: process_ticket=#306,#308 merged_to_feature_branch=yes
 - risks_or_notes: TASK-V2-012 구현 갭 보완을 위해 cost guard + execution-adjusted fold metric + 회귀 테스트를 함께 반영한다.
+
+### 2026-03-02 | session=codex-v3-stream-next-ticket-369
+- branch: feature/v3-session-policy-stream
+- docs_checked: docs/workflow.md, docs/commands.md, docs/agent-constraints.md
+- open_issues_reviewed: #369, #370, #371, #374, #375, #376, #377, #381
+- next_ticket: #369
+- process_gate_checked: process_ticket=#306,#308 merged_to_feature_branch=yes
+- risks_or_notes: 구현 티켓은 코드/테스트/문서(요구사항 원장/구현감사/PR traceability) 동시 반영을 기본 원칙으로 진행한다.
+
+### 2026-03-02 | session=codex-issue369-start
+- branch: feature/issue-369-model-exit-signal-spec-sync
+- docs_checked: docs/workflow.md, docs/commands.md, docs/agent-constraints.md
+- open_issues_reviewed: #369
+- next_ticket: #369
+- process_gate_checked: process_ticket=#306,#308 merged_to_feature_branch=yes
+- risks_or_notes: v2 사양 기준으로 model_exit_signal을 직접 청산 트리거가 아닌 보조 트리거로 정합화하고 테스트/문서를 동기화한다.
+
+### 2026-03-02 | session=codex-v3-stream-next-ticket-377
+- branch: feature/v3-session-policy-stream
+- docs_checked: docs/workflow.md, docs/commands.md, docs/agent-constraints.md
+- open_issues_reviewed: #377, #370, #371, #375, #376, #381
+- next_ticket: #377
+- process_gate_checked: process_ticket=#306,#308 merged_to_feature_branch=yes
+- risks_or_notes: kill switch refresh 재시도 정책(횟수/간격/중단조건)을 코드/테스트/요구사항 원장/감사 문서에 동시 반영한다.
+
+### 2026-03-02 | session=codex-issue377-start
+- branch: feature/issue-377-kill-switch-refresh-retry
+- docs_checked: docs/workflow.md, docs/commands.md, docs/agent-constraints.md
+- open_issues_reviewed: #377
+- next_ticket: #377
+- process_gate_checked: process_ticket=#306,#308 merged_to_feature_branch=yes
+- risks_or_notes: refresh 단계를 최대 3회(초기+재시도2), 실패 시 지수 백오프로 재시도하고 성공 시 즉시 중단, 소진 시 오류를 기록한 뒤 다음 단계를 계속 수행한다.